Saturday, March 28, 2026

AI Can’t Taste Bad Food

Walk into a restaurant.

Food tastes off. Not terrible. Just… wrong.

AI scans 10,000 reviews.
“Negative sentiment increased by 18%.”

Cool. Useless.

It can tell you when people get unhappy.
It can’t tell you why the food suddenly feels dead.

That gap? That’s your job security.

Here’s the divide no one explains properly.

Deterministic work is clean.
1+1=2. Data in, answer out. Scheduling. Reporting. Pattern repetition.

AI dominates here. No debate.

Non-deterministic work is messy.
Ego. Mood. Timing. Power plays. Gut instinct. The things people don’t say out loud.

AI struggles here. Not because it’s weak. Because the variables aren’t fixed.

And that’s the trap.

People are trying to beat AI at deterministic work. Faster reports. Better prompts. Cleaner outputs.

That’s a losing game.

You’re competing in a lane where perfection is programmable.

Shift lanes.

The real leverage is in what AI can’t lock down.

Why did the team suddenly stop caring?
Why did a campaign technically “work” but feel off?
Why does one product click emotionally and another dies silently?

There’s no dataset for that. Only signals.

Tiny, human signals buried in chaos.

Most people ignore them because they’re harder to explain. No charts. No clear logic. Just instinct sharpened by attention.

That’s where value is shifting.

Map your work honestly.

If it runs on rules, it’s replaceable.
If it runs on reading people, it’s defensible.

Brutal truth.

Stop trying to become a better machine.

Start becoming someone who understands what machines can’t even see.

This is the edge.

More coming.

No comments:

Post a Comment

AI Can’t Taste Bad Food